1 - 18 Jan. 2004

Last update 19 Jan. 2004
http://www.sovest.org
×ÅËÎÂÅÊ ÐÎÆÄÀÅÒÑß ÑÂÎÁÎÄÍÛÌ. ÌÛ ÍÅ ÏÎÇÂÎËÈÌ ÍÀÄÅÒÜ ÍÀ ÑÅÁß ÎÊÎÂÛ.

Here:
Gen. Clark draws a crowd
Clark Campaign Responds To Dean Secret Strategy Disclosure
Poll: Clark closes in on Dean
A Letter from Madonna
Women For Clark
The general's wife
Showing Their Primary Colors
Clark defends 2002 Iraq statement
LA Meetup with Wes II
More on Wesley Clark's Program:
Turnaround Plan
Families First: Tax Reform Plan, etc
Direction, Military Reform

Wesley Clark's official sites:
http://clark04.com
http://americansforclark.com
http://draftwesleyclark.com

Milosevic attacks Clark on trial by citing Shelton's words. Clinton sends a letter to defend Clark
- added 17 Jan. 2004

Portsmouth, NH     Sunday, January 4, 2004

Gen. Clark draws a crowd

By Jack Loftus
jloftus@seacoastonline.com


Wesley Clark

Wesley Clark

PORTSMOUTH - There was little room to maneuver on Saturday afternoon as Democratic presidential candidate Gen. Wesley Clark visited the South Church after a short walk through downtown Portsmouth.

Before the retired Army general’s arrival, supporters were seen breaking out additional chairs, and the second-story balcony was filled to capacity with additional supporters hoping to hear the candidate speak during his campaign stop.

Every pew was filled and the rear aisles were packed with people shoulder to shoulder as Clark made his way into the church to greet supporters and speak on patriotism and family values, and to mention the names of a few potential running mates.

When asked who he believed would make a strong vice president, Clark answered, "Any of the other candidates in this race," in addition to Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., who also made the list of potential running mates.

During his remarks to the crowd, Clark touched upon several issues that fell under categories like patriotism and family values.

"Patriotism, to me, is using American forces to protect America, but only when absolutely necessary," Clark said. "Patriotism, to me, is pulling together after 9/11 and going after Osama bin Laden. George Bush went after Saddam Hussein without connections (to bin Laden). This country is still owed an explanation as to why we went to war in Iraq."

Clark continued, "Now that we’re in it, we’re going to do the best we can to support our men and women ... who are doing the best they can, but the country asked them to do the wrong thing."

The four-star general promised that if he is elected president the nation will continue to field the strongest military in the world, but that international law, diplomacy and working with America’s allies will supersede the use of force, which would only be used as a last resort.

Clark then shifted his political gears to family values, something he said "the other political party" has given "the entirely wrong definition."

"You can’t have family values if you don’t have jobs. You can’t have family values if you can’t get to the doctor’s office," Clark said.

Another contributing factor to the breakdown of American values is the fact that higher education costs have risen 28 percent during the Bush administration, Clark said, adding that personal income has not increased along with these costs.

"The only people I know whose income has gone up over four years is Halliburton," he said, alluding to the major corporation Vice President Dick Cheney formerly ran. "George Bush has priced kids out of school."

In support of family values, Clark pledged that, during his first term as president, he would provide a $3,000 family income raise, in addition to higher education grants for students in their first and second years of college.

"I have one more value," Clark said. "Everyone has equal rights; people not born on an equal playing field need to be helped up to that level.

"We need leadership that is not just good enough for re-election, but leadership that is good for the country," Clark said before handing the microphone over the public for the "conversation" portion of the afternoon.

It was during this conversation period that the name Hillary Clinton made its way into Clark’s list of running mates for the presidential ticket. Also making the list was Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla.

Clark also pledged to win back the House and Senate for Democrats, cautioning that "it will be a very tough fight," but that he has the experience other candidates lack to accomplish the job.

"I won’t talk about other candidates ... but if you want a lawyer, get a lawyer; if you want a doctor, get a doctor; but if you want a leader, then get a leader," he said.

"I’m running not because I’ve been scheming and plotting to climb the political ladder; I’m running because I think the nation is at an incredible crossroads," Clark said. "We’re bogged down in Iraq, the world is angry about our unilateral position ... we have a foreign policy that is not sustainable. We need to help Americans help Americans, and then we can help Americans help the world," Clark said. 

Back to the Portsmouth Herald

top

Press release #154 http://clark04.com/press/release/154/

Press Room

For Immediate Release
Date: January 6, 2003

Clark Campaign Responds To Dean Secret Strategy Disclosure

Little Rock - Yesterday, the Dean campaign inadvertently revealed to reporters its secret strategy to discredit General Clark. The strategy was reported in today's Arizona Republic (read the article here below).

As the Republic reports, the Dean camp plans to use Bill Bradley's endorsement to counter the perception among New Hampshire voters - apparently evident in the Dean polling - that Governor Dean is "indecisive," and they plan to use both former Senator Bradley and other surrogates to attack General Clark.

Clark Campaign Communications Director Matt Bennett responded to this report:

"The Dean camp's secret back-room plotting to have Bill Bradley and others attack Wes Clark isn't a bit surprising. Governor Dean seems to like others to do his heavy lifting - just last week Howard Dean asked Democratic Party Chairman Terry McAuliffe to protect him from the criticisms of his rivals. The fundamental difference between Governor Dean and General Clark is that Howard Dean is a politician, and Wes Clark is a leader."

"Wes Clark has run a war, making life and death decisions every day. If the Dean Campaign wants to have a debate about decisiveness, we're ready."


Howard Dean

Howard Dean


Wesley Clark

Wesley Clark

THE ARIZONA REPUBLIC
ONLINE PRINT EDITION

Dean called 'real Democrat'
Front-runner's strategies add boost from Bradley

Jon Kamman
The Arizona Republic
Jan. 6, 2004 12:00 AM

With former U.S. Sen. Bill Bradley's endorsement of presidential candidate Howard Dean today, the former Vermont governor's campaign is likely to emphasize that the front-runner is "a real Democrat" and more decisive than former Gen. Wesley Clark.

In a telephone conference call that reporters were invited by mistake to hook into, Dean's campaign staff spoke candidly about strategy surrounding the impending Bradley endorsement.

"Tomorrow, (Tuesday) we're going to start by having Bradley do sort of a subtle thing, if we can, by saying that Dean is a real Democrat, and then follow that up the next day with an in-state person that's probably a little more direct," one unidentified staffer said.

The "in-state" appeared to be a reference to New Hampshire, where Bradley, Al Gore's opponent for the 2000 Democratic presidential nomination, was to appear this morning at a previously unscheduled breakfast.

Another staffer indicated that in a survey of voters Monday by telephone, people expressed concern that "this guy (Dean) is indecisive" and Bradley, a former Hall of Fame player in the National Basketball Association and a three-term senator from New Jersey, could help counter that.

"The Bradley message could be, like, (Dean) knew where he stood on the war, is still a Democrat, takes . . . positions, blah, blah, blah," the staffer said.

The next day, the speaker said, "surrogates" for Dean, both local and national, could "then hit Clark on the flip side of the argument: that he's indecisive, didn't know what party he's with, doesn't know his position on the war," she said.

The strategists ended their conversation when another reporter joined the conference, telling him, "I think you may have the wrong call-in number. This isn't a press call."

Minutes later, by calling the same line, Arizona reporters conducted a 10-minute interview with Dean on the No Child Left Behind Act, the educational reform measure championed by President Bush.

Dean said the 2-year-old law "in general has been a disaster for American public education." He said some of its measures were worthy, but the law "asks for much more than it's willing to pay for."

"Property taxes all over Arizona have gone up, as they have elsewhere in the country, because these standards are so foolish," he said.

In Phoenix, Kevin McCarthy, president of the nonpartisan Arizona Tax Research Association, said that although expenditures for public education in the state have grown dramatically, it would be a "huge stretch" to attribute an extra property-tax burden to the federal act.

Arizona is less dependent than many other states on property taxes for support of schools, McCarthy said. He added, however, that some of the effects of No Child Left Behind may not have hit Arizona yet.

Courtney O'Donnell, a national spokeswoman for Dean's campaign, said she did not know what colleagues discussed in the earlier telephone conference, but the important development was Bradley's alignment with Dean.

"It's big in Arizona," state campaign manager Frank Costanzo added. "Bradley had a lot of support here in 2000," including that of then-state Democratic chairman Mark Fleisher.

Meanwhile Monday, in Bakersfield, Calif., Dolores C. Huerta, co-founder of the United Farm Workers of America, endorsed Dean along with her longtime companion, Richard Chavez, brother of the late UFW leader Cesar Chavez.

Reach the reporter at jon.kamman@arizonarepublic.com or (602) 444-4816.

top

Tucson Citizen
www.tucsoncitizen.com

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 7, 2004

Poll: Clark closes in on Dean

Gannett News Service


Wesley Clark

Wesley Clark

WASHINGTON - Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor who pulled away from the Democratic field in early December, has lost his lead over No. 2 Wesley Clark, the former NATO commander, a USA TODAY/CNN/Gallup poll shows.

Dean slipped from a 21-point gap to 4 points, effectively a tie within the margin of error.

President Bush begins the election year with the national mood improving and his support on key issues building. Overall, 60 percent of those surveyed approve of the job Bush is doing. His ratings on handling the economy, Iraq, education and taxes are all favorable. And 55 percent say they are satisfied with the way things are going in the country, the highest level in nearly nine months.

If Dean is the Democratic nominee, the poll finds, Bush beats him by 22 percentage points among likely voters. Against an unnamed Democrat, Bush wins by 17 percentage points.

"These are very positive numbers for the president," says Merle Black, a political scientist at Emory University in Atlanta. "If they continue into the spring, it will be difficult for Bush to lose. He's doing well on the two main issues the election will be fought over, the economy and Iraq."

Bush is still enjoying a bounce from the Dec. 14 capture of Saddam Hussein and good news on the economic front, says Democratic pollster Celinda Lake.

Dean's slip and uncertainty among Democrats suggests that the nomination fight is still fluid. The first key contests are precinct caucuses Jan. 19 in Iowa and primary balloting Jan. 27 in New Hampshire. Arizona's Democratic primary is Feb. 3.

Dean still leads in polls in both states. Clark is not competing in Iowa, where Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt is Dean's strongest rival.

Other than Clark, Democratic candidates made few gains in the USA TODAY poll in the past month.

Voters view Clark more favorably than Dean, fueling charges by the other candidates that Dean cannot beat Bush. Clark is the only Democrat with an overall positive rating.

Just 28 percent of adults view Dean favorably; 39 percent view him unfavorably. Clark rates 37 percent favorable and 26 percent unfavorable.

Bush has a 65 percent-35 percent favorable-unfavorable ratio.

top

A Letter from Madonna
(As appeared on Madonna's web site.)


A Letter from Madonna

Madonna endorses Wes Clark

I've never done this before. But life is about taking risks is it not?

I know that people seem to pay attention to everything I do. Big or Small. Ridiculous or Sublime. So I am hoping they pay attention to this:

I am supporting General Wesley Clark for President.

Not only as a "celebrity" but as an American citizen and as a mother. I want my children to grow up with the same opportunities that I had - to know and understand what's going on in the world and to travel that world safely and with pride.

Now I'm asking you to join me.

I am writing to you because the future I wish for my children is at risk.

Our greatest risk is not terrorism and it's not Iraq or the "Axis of Evil." Our greatest risk is a lack of leadership, a lack of honesty and a complete lack of consciousness. Unfortunately our current government cannot see the big picture. They think too small. They suffer from the "what's in it for me?" syndrome. The simple truth is that the current administration has squandered incredible opportunities to bring the world together, to promote peace in regions that have only known war, to encourage health in places that are ravaged with disease, to make us more secure by living up to our principles at home and abroad. The simple truth is that the policies of our current administration do not reflect what is great about America.

Thankfully, there is now a candidate running for President who is committed to ensuring that our country lives up to its promise and its people. He is a decorated soldier and a respected diplomatic leader, who has already given 34 years to his country. He is smart and he is good. He has worked hard to get where he is and he is a national hero.

A perfect example of the American Dream.

I've never aligned myself with a presidential candidate during the primary season. But this time, the stakes are too high, we have too much to lose and there is so much work to be done.

I'm supporting General Wesley Clark in 2004 and have committed to do all that I can to help his campaign in the coming months. I ask you to visit his website today to learn about his candidacy, his vision for our nation and the many ways you can get involved.

I've looked at all the Democratic candidates. I respect them all for their dedication and patriotism. But I'm supporting Wes Clark because in him I see the qualifications, character and vision that we so desperately need.

We are a country with incredible promise. As Americans we enjoy opportunities like no other. Unfortunately we take these opportunities for granted. You may not agree with everything I say or do, but whether you're rich or poor, young or old, black or white, gay or straight, I know you share my concern and recognize the need for change.

Even if you've never been involved with politics before, please consider joining with me. If you can give, give generously. If you can volunteer time, get involved now. And if you can vote, this time... make sure you do.

Wesley Clark has asked for my support and now I'm asking for yours

Madonna

PS: Please spread this message to everyone you know.


top

http://clark04.com/women
Women For Clark

Valuing Women

Here:
Valuing Women
Top 10 Reasons
Testimonials from Women for Clark
and other supporters


Clark and women

Throughout my career I have worked hard to recruit and promote women in our armed forces and in business. And I was proud to see more and more women move up the ranks. Because the wider the military opened its doors, the stronger it got. That's why I will work hard to expand the number of women-owned businesses, break through the glass ceiling that keeps women from and eliminate the pay gap between men and women. I will start with my Administration by ensuring that women are in leadership roles in the White House.

Top 10 Reasons Women Are Voting for Wes Clark

Here:
Valuing Women
Top 10 Reasons

Wes Clark is committed to:

  1. Equal Economic Opportunity for Women by increasing penalties for employers that discriminate against women, investing in job training for women, aggressively addressing the pay gap, and increasing the minimum wage to keep pace with the cost of living.

  2. Putting Families First by implementing a tax plan that gives a tax break to families with children with an income of $100,000 or less, and lifts all federal taxes from families of four with an income up to $50,000. Also, implementing a jobs plan that devotes $100 billion over two years to jumpstart job creation without increasing the deficit.

  3. Ensuring Reproductive rights and reproductive health by supporting Roe v. Wade, supporting legislation to cover FDA-approved prescription contraceptive drugs/devices, and appointing judges who will uphold laws protecting women's reproductive rights.

  4. Ensuring the safety of all Americans by re-engaging with our international allies, investing $40 billion to close the gaps in America's homeland security, and enforcing existing gun laws.

  5. Improving our health care by making insurance more affordable for everyone, supporting equal funding for gender-based health research on diseases that disproportionately affect women and girls, continuing the fight on AIDS by substantially increasing AIDS funding, and supporting passage of the Human Cloning Ban and the Stem Cell Research Protection Act.

  6. Protecting our civil rights by supporting affirmative action, ensuring that discrimination laws include gender and sexual orientation, and calling on Congress to review each provision of the Patriot Act and eliminate those provisions that unduly threaten our civil liberties.

  7. Improving our education by providing pre-school access, investing resources to expand Head Start, and implementing the Universal College Grant to help students with a family income less than $100,000.

  8. Protecting our seniors by working to improve and expand our system for long-term care, maintain the current retirement age, and not privatize social security.

  9. Supporting our families by expanding paid family leave, making child care affordable for everyone, and lifting 2 million children out of poverty by 2008.

  10. Protecting our environment by vigorously enforcing all clean air and clean water laws, by reversing the Bush administration's cutbacks in environmental investigations, funding, and enforcement.

top

boston.com/news/politics

The General's Wife
As Wesley Clark runs for office, Gert Clark is in a familiar role

By Joanna Weiss, Globe Staff, 1/12/2004


Gert Clark

After an initial reluctance to be a public figure, Gert Clark has become a fixture in her husband's campaign. (Globe Staff Photo / Janet Knott)

DOVER, N.H. -- It was a far cry from the quiet post-military life she once imagined. Gert Clark was wrapped in an overcoat in the frigid New Hampshire air, in front of a crowd of Arkansans huddled in the cold. They had come to cheer their hometown candidate, retired Army general Wesley K. Clark. But it wasn't long before their chants turned to the woman beside him with white-blonde hair: "Gert! Gert! Gert! Gert!"

This wouldn't have seemed possible a few months ago, when Gertrude Kingston Clark's reservations were the last thing that stood between her husband's interest in running for president and his entry in the race. "I think any woman would look at her family first," she said last month. "And politics can be very brutal on the family."

In the early days of the campaign, Gert Clark stayed home, reluctant to be a public figure. But suddenly in December, she became a fixture on the trail, accompanying her husband to events, holding his jacket and waving to crowds, mingling with voters on the sidelines, eventually making appearances on her own. And slipping into a role she played for more than three decades, the ceremonial -- and rather first-lady-like -- role of military spouse.

The Clarks saw themselves as partners at Army posts, she said: She was his eyes and ears among the rank and file, telling him about military families' concerns. They were envoys together when he headed the European Command, mingling with royalty at elegant dinners. They supported Republican candidates together, before their Democratic conversion; when he worked at the Pentagon in the mid-1990s, she volunteered almost daily for Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Republican of Texas. Gert Clark even describes a political change of heart in lockstep with her husband's.

From Hutchison's office, where she worked on constituent services and military families' issues, she says, "I started seeing the rise of Tom DeLay and other people. For me, at least, I think that the Republican Party was too far to the right." As for her husband's increasingly harsh rhetoric against the Republican Party -- she agrees with him there, too. "I think the things that Wes is criticizing, I'm comfortable with, yes," she said.

Some of this season's would-be first ladies have famously defied tradition. On one end of the spectrum, Dr. Judith Steinberg, the wife of former Vermont governor Howard Dean, refuses to campaign and has talked of continuing to practice medicine if her husband reaches the White House. On the other, Teresa Heinz Kerry, wife of Senator John F. Kerry, talks candidly to the press and has made headlines of her own, dismissing candidate debates as "silly" and railing about the status of Guantanamo Bay prisoners.

Clark fits somewhere in the middle, closer to the expected norms of the political spouse. On the stump, she has gone from being seen but seldom heard to introducing speakers on her husband's recent "True Grits" Southern tour, then campaigning by herself in South Carolina. She often lingers on the edge of rooms, chatting with voters, her low voice traced with a native New York accent. She doesn't take part in policy decisions but says she discusses the campaign regularly with her husband.

"I certainly wouldn't criticize anybody else's spouse for their choices, because that would be wrong," she says. "Wes and I have always felt best in our marriage and in our lives when we've been a partnership."

Then she adds, "I don't mean that I'm going to go to Capitol Hill and get a health care bill passed."

Still, there's little doubt that, from her husband's standpoint, her opinion matters. During one New Hampshire event in mid-November, Wesley Clark realized he had told the crowd his wife had never worked, and he rushed to clarify the record.

"Correction! Correction! Save me! Wait!" he yelped, springing forward as if he had been pricked with something sharp. "My wife worked herself to death! She just didn't earn any money! That's all I meant!"

The role of a general's wife shares a fair amount in common with the role of a first lady -- or, given the rigidity of military hierarchies, the benevolent lady of a manor house. When Wesley Clark served as a commander in Colorado, California, Texas, Panama, and Europe, Gert Clark says she regularly talked with the families of soldiers who served under him about education, rent, and how they were treated by civilians. She volunteered with an advocacy group, the National Military Family Association.

And when her husband was NATO's supreme allied commander in Europe, she played the role of a diplomat's spouse, traveling with him 200 days out of the year. She recalls landing on airstrips to find red carpets laid and bands playing, hobnobbing with princes and princesses, and holding conversations with Archduke Rudolf of Austria, "the last of the Hapsburgs."

It could be a rarefied life, recalls Cris Hernandez, a retired Army warrant officer who was the Clarks' personal security officer in Europe -- where they lived in a mansion in Mons, Belgium, donated by the Belgian government.

"The First Lady of SHAPE, I would call her," Hernandez says, using the miltary shorthand for the post, the Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe. "If you would talk to people in Europe, the Clarks were very well known. When the Clarks went to a function, they were `the' couple, if you will."

But while generals' wives have a reputation for being aloof, he says, Gert Clark wasn't distant with her husband's immense staff, or the people under his command. Part of her purview was decorating the chateau for the holidays, he says; she would invite the wives of officers and enlisted soldiers to help. She arranged food and clothing drives for refugees, visited schools, and held luncheons with Army wives.

"She wasn't afraid to come down to our level," says Hernandez, who keeps in close touch with the Clarks. "We'd be flying back to the United States, she'd be back playing cards with the security guys. She'd come back there, flop down, and just start talking to us. We didn't look at her as being the general's wife."

Clark didn't come from a privileged background; she grew up in a family of six in Brooklyn, N.Y., where she attended Catholic schools and her father worked for Catholic Charities. (After her mother's death, she said, she began attending Protestant church and reading the Bible frequently.)

She recalls the time, at 19, when she reluctantly went to a USO dance that her father's secretary was organizing. There, she met a naive Arkansan with intense eyes who wasn't sure if the drink he was holding was, indeed, a Manhattan.

"He was very unique in so many ways," she says. "The way he looked and what he talked about. He had an innocence about him."

They dated on and off for two years, got engaged when he was a Rhodes Scholar in Oxford, and married in June 1967.

Soon after they returned to the United States, he was sent to Vietnam. While he was away, he converted to Catholicism. She gave birth to their only child, Wes Jr. In Vietnam, Clark was shot three times and came back wounded in the shoulder, hand, hip, and leg.

"You're 25, 26 years of age, your husband comes back on a stretcher," she says. "It's an emotional challenge. But it's like everything else. You sort of just do it."

Now Wesley Clark is 59; Gert Clark won't confirm her age, telling an aide to pass on the adage that a lady shouldn't give her age or weight. After 34 years in the military, Wesley Clark retired in 2000. The Clarks settled in Little Rock, Arkansas, his hometown, where she joined the board of the Boys and Girls Club and he became an investment banker and registered lobbyist, joined corporate boards, and gave paid speeches. His income rose from $84,000 in 1999 to $1.6 million last year.

When he began testing the waters of a presidential campaign in 2002, he got ample encouragement from friends and strangers. But she was reluctant to leave her newfound private life behind, says Nancy Alsheimer, a friend since the 1980s.

"They had just started playing golf together, and she was having more of him," Alsheimer says. "This was going to change their lives considerably."

Alsheimer says she advised Gert Clark that if she couldn't find people to talk to amid the rigors of the trail, "just go into the bathroom and have a primeval scream." It's unclear whether she does. But she swears that once she decided to step into the race, she started to enjoy it.

She certainly looked that way last month in Columbia, S.C., when she joined her husband for the second church service he attended on a Sunday morning. The candidate had been quiet and still at the first church, occasionally whispering to his companions. But this time, when the music started soaring, Gert Clark started waving her arms in the air.

Soon he joined in, with slightly awkward, jerking motions, as if his muscles couldn't shake those years of military training. But with his wife smiling at his side, Wesley Clark waved and swayed and grinned through the entire service.

top

FORTUNE

POLITICS
Jan. 13, 2003

Showing Their Primary Colors
As the Democrats scramble toward New Hampshire, their economic plans come into focus. Protectionism, anyone?

By Bill Powell

More January 2004 polls

Howard Dean is thundering that he's going to abolish Bush's "irresponsible" tax cuts. Dick Gephardt is itching to start a trade war with somebody. Joe Lieberman sounds more like a Republican every day. Yes, folks, the primary season is officially upon us. And for all the cynicism typically associated with Iowa and New Hampshire, this is a presidential cycle in which policy differences, even among Democrats, are stark and serious when it comes to tax policy, the deficit, and trade. From Howard Dean out front to Senators Joe Lieberman and John Edwards in the rear—and Gen. Wesley Clark, Representative Gephardt, and Senator John Kerry in between—only six of the nine Dems have remotely possible chances of becoming President. (If we're wrong, mea culpa to Dennis Kucinich, Al Sharpton, and Carol Moseley Braun.) All trail Bush in head-to-head polls, but it would be rash to conclude that none is electable.

When this cycle began a year ago, the Democrats were counting on the economy to provide traction as an issue. The sharp recovery and a (so far) slowly declining unemployment rate are taking some of that edge off—but only some. Democrats still believe there's political gold to be mined in the jobs issue (particularly since the latest monthly data showed virtually no job growth), and in those unnerving deficits.

How the Candidates Stack Up
Candidate Best policy Worst policy
Howard Dean Honesty about tax cuts—says he'd get rid of 'em all Why does he want to stick it to the middle class by getting rid of its tax cut?
John Kerry Realistic goals for cutting the deficit The heart of his "job creation plan" is a sop to public sector unions
Dick Gephardt Wins points for audacity with bold plan for health-care overhaul Still doesn't get it on trade, and never will
Joseph Lieberman Unlike other Dems, he's a committed free-trader His China-bashing is excessive
John Edwards Call for "economic revitalization zones" worth a look Plan to restore "fiscal discipline" is almost a parody of political gutlessness
Wesley Clark Has a fairly detailed tax reform plan His plan to save billions by "streamlining" government isn't credible

Take the latter. Fiscal policy—or more specifically, taxes—has suddenly become a hot issue for the Democrats. Front-runner Howard Dean shot to the head of the polls mainly because he opposed the Iraq war. But along the way he happily proposed rescinding every penny of Bush's tax cuts, his somewhat dubious logic being that everything was fine under Bill Clinton, so let's just go back to the tax code in place when he left office. Among Democratic activists, who despise Bush, that didn't hurt Dean. Now, as more people start to pay attention to the campaign, he'll face greater scrutiny. Every other candidate except Gephardt—who'd repeal all of Bush's tax cuts to fund a massive health insurance scheme—has said he would retain some form of tax relief for the middle class while raising taxes on corporations and the rich to bring down the deficit. (Definitions of who the "rich" are, of course, vary: Edwards, for example, draws the line at individuals earning more than $240,000 a year.) Clark, running second in New Hampshire, recently issued a fairly detailed plan for sweeping tax reform. It would retain some of Bush's tax relief for families earning less than $100,000 but also raise tax rates on income over $1 million. Clark says the proposal is "revenue neutral"; critics say it amounts to a significant tax increase. In any event, it would not, at least, add to the deficit. Clark now has Dean's attention, and the Vermonter will apparently soon respond with his own new tax reform proposal.

Politicians with specific proposals to cut spending tend not to get nominated. For that reason what they say about balancing the budget is about as squishy as it can be. Edwards is fairly typical: With a straight face he says he would cut "excessive spending" by "closing government agencies that have outlived their usefulness, like the Office of Thrift Supervision." But as Economy.com chief economist Mark Zandi points out, at this point the game is simply establishing more credibility than the President on an issue that Americans say they care about—in this case fiscal sobriety. (How much they actually do care is another subject.) Says Zandi: "The people really in charge at the White House just don't seem to believe deficits matter that much. Most of the Democrats are at least saying that it does, and that they'll do something about it."

What voters do absolutely care about, of course, is employment. And the steady drain of manufacturing jobs, especially in critical battleground states like Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, makes trade policy particularly critical this year (witness Bush's politically driven, boneheaded steel-tariff decision, which he was forced to back down on late last year). Here there are substantive differences among the Democrats. Gephardt, who must win in Iowa to have a prayer in this campaign, has been a flat-out protectionist for years. He calls the U.S. trade deficit an "American crisis and a global tragedy." That Gephardt is beyond redemption on trade is not news. (Though seriously, Dick, the trade deficit may be an American "crisis," but a "global tragedy"? Last time we checked, the Chinese were not crying in their snake soup over how much stuff they were selling us.) More interesting is that Dean and Edwards have followed him, making it clear, for example, that any new trade agreements would have to meet stiff—and arguably unrealistic—labor and environmental standards.

Lieberman, by contrast, has bluntly warned that protectionism is fool's gold. So haveClark and (to an extent, anyway) Kerry. That common sense could conceivably serve one of them well in later primaries in bigger, more economically diverse states. That candidate will be whoever finishes second behind Dean in New Hampshire. The rest will be history.

From the Jan. 26, 2004 Issue

top

CNN:

Clark defends 2002 Iraq statement
Being attacked: 'The sincerest form of flattery in politics'

Jan. 13, 2004


Wesley Clark

Wesley Clark enjoys a lighthearted moment Monday evening at a fund-raiser in Dallas, Texas.

LONDONDERRY, New Hampshire (AP) -- Democratic presidential candidate Wesley Clark said Monday a statement he made in 2002 about connections between Iraq and al-Qaeda was consistent with his belief that Saddam Hussein was not linked to the September 11 terrorist attacks.

In an October 2002 news conference in which he endorsed a New Hampshire Democrat for Congress, Clark said, "Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and al Qaeda."

According to a videotape provided by a rival campaign, Clark said, "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to al Qaeda, that there would be some al Qaeda there or that Saddam Hussein might even be, you know, discussing, 'Gee, I wonder since I don't have any Scuds and since the Americans are coming at me, I wonder if I could take advantage of al-Qaeda? How would I do it? Is it worth the risk? What could they do for me?"'

Campaigning in New Hampshire, Clark said Monday the two-year-old statement is not inconsistent with views he expressed in a book and during his presidential bid.

"It would be naive to think the Iraqi intelligence agency never tracked anyone from al-Qaeda, but that's a far cry from saying there's any relationship between Saddam Hussein and 9/11," he said. "I've always said there's no relationship. I was doing nothing but explaining a New York Times front-page story of that day and discounting it."

On the day of Clark's 2002 news conference, the Times reported the CIA's claim that it had credible reports that al Qaeda leaders had sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction.

Asked Monday if he thinks low-level contacts still exist between al Qaeda and Iraq, Clark said he has no idea.

"My point has been simply this: There wasn't any likelihood that Saddam Hussein was connected to 9/11," he said. "It would not surprise me if the Iraqi intelligence agency had sometime met with someone from al Qaeda in Beirut, Lebanon, or somewhere else, just to find out who they were or what they were doing."

Also Monday, former New Hampshire Gov. Jeanne Shaheen, the national chairwoman of Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry's presidential campaign, renewed criticism of Clark's praise for the Bush administration two years ago.

Shaheen and two other state Democratic officials noted that Clark was a keynote speaker at a Republican fund-raiser in May 2001, and that he praised President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other members of the administration. They also played a video of Clark's speech.

Clark and Kerry are competing for second place, behind Howard Dean, in the New Hampshire presidential primary on January 27. (CNN.com's interactive Election Calendar)

Shaheen said "the issue here is this candidate is not a Democrat," and doesn't support Democratic values.

"I welcome Wesley Clark to our party," she said. "But I just don't think someone who raised money for Republicans, praised George W. Bush after he had begun his systematic reversal of Bill Clinton's policies" should be the Democratic nominee, she said.

Clark responded: "When you're attacked like this, it's the sincerest form of flattery in politics." (Dean: 'Tired of being the pin cushion')

top

LA Meetup with Wes II

By ccobb
Posted to ccobb's weblog on Tue Jan 6th, 2004 at 01:10:59 AM EST

Wes III couldn't make it, so he sent his father instead.

A raise of hands showed that for at least half of the attendees, this was their first meetup. Another raise of hands showed that maybe 1/4 were there to research the general and hadn't made up their minds yet. I think they are still there, surrounded by helpful true believers answering questions they are not even asking yet.

As for the crowd, I stopped counting at about 70 because Wes popped up for a Q&A session. In the end we may have had somewhere between 75 and 90. During the Q&A, a lot of basic questions were asked and answered (Shelton? Health Care? Tax reform?). But Wes also shared some interesting anecdotes that I thought you would like to hear too:

A great line: "You can't have a democracy with secrecy." Basic, but powerful.

Schwatzkopff retraction (never knew him)
- added 19 Jan. 2004

Wes mentioned that Schwarzkopf tried to get the General kicked off the West Point debate team. Makes me assume that Schwartzy's current animus goes back to college frat boy stuff.

When the General was exploring whether or not he should run, he came to LA and met with a number of media people. Warren Beatty walked out of the meeting saying 'I don't think he's got it. He doesn't have a big enough ego.'

During the General's testimony in The Hague, Milosevic used Shelton's quote smearing Clark's character and integrity to impugn the General's testimony. The prosecutor Carla de la Ponte called Shelton to confirm and to evaluate whether he should come to testify on Milosevic's behalf. Shelton backpedaled, saying it was 'just politics.'

Wes answered a question about what a family meant in the General's tax plan as 'a mother, a father and two kids; or a mother, a mother and two kids; or a mother and two kids--whoever lives in a joint domicile,' making it clear he did not think that orientation or marital status were the defining issues. I'm sure that more clarity will come as we go along. The question I didn't ask but wanted to was: can dogs count as kids?

When asked what moment made him most proud of his dad, Wes thought for a moment, and then said he was really proud when his father went down that cliff to save those folks in his caravan. There he was, 50-something, charging down a cliff towards a burning armored car as ammo exploded around him from the heat and fire. The way Wes summed that moment up was that he was most proud because his dad was the right man at the right time doing the right thing. A lot of heads nodded. It was a nice moment, because we could tell that Wes was also proud that his dad was doing the same thing today by running for president.

I am a skeptic by nature, but found myself impressed. I am a longtime convert to the General; in fact I'm a Draft Clarkie. But it certainly helped to watch and weigh Wes II's words. Much as I hate to judge one person by another, Wes II didn't come out of a vacuum; he was raised well, is obviously smart, and had a common touch with no pretension to him whatsoever. Again, that doesn't come from nowhere. And it just reconfirmed and strengthened my commitment.

One final tidbit--Gert Clark may come out here for a fundraising dinner ($100/head was thrown out). We may not be first in the nation and all that, but I think we did luck out by living in the same city as her grandson. ;-)

top

AEIWI Search

HOME